🎉 10% off your first order over ₹2,000 — use code WELCOME10 at checkout
BacklinkCart

Re-checked 2026-09-02

A free backlink sites list where every entry was actually checked

Sixty platforms that let you publish a page or a profile, fetched one by one on the date shown. The useful part is not the ones that work — it is the entries every copied list still gets wrong.

60

checked

48

answered normally

6

blocked our request

6

dead or moved

Checked on 2026-09-02. A domain “answered normally” if it returned a success response over HTTPS and did not redirect to a different domain. That is the entire claim — it does not mean the platform still accepts new accounts, still allows an outbound link, or gives a do-follow one. Those cannot be established by fetching a page, so we do not put a column here pretending otherwise.

6 entries that other lists still carry

These are the useful part. Each one appears in widely-copied lists and is no longer where those lists say it is.

Listed asWhat happened
telegra.phdid not resolve
yola.comtimed out
carrd.conow redirects to carrd.com
bibsonomy.orgdid not resolve
notion.sonow redirects to notion.com
mystrikingly.comnow redirects to strikingly.com

The 54 that answered

Publishing · 15

Mediummedium.comblocks automated checks
WordPress.comwordpress.comresponded
Bloggerblogger.comresponded
Tumblrtumblr.comresponded
Substacksubstack.comresponded
Ghostghost.orgresponded
Write.aswrite.asresponded
Hashnodehashnode.comresponded
DEV Communitydev.toresponded
Bear Blogbearblog.devresponded
LiveJournallivejournal.comresponded
Penzupenzu.comresponded
Edublogsedublogs.orgresponded
Over-Blogover-blog.comresponded
HubPageshubpages.comblocks automated checks

Site builder · 8

Weeblyweebly.comresponded
Wixwix.comresponded
Strikinglystrikingly.comresponded
Jimdojimdo.comresponded
Webnodewebnode.comresponded
SITE123site123.comresponded
uCozucoz.comresponded
Google Sitessites.google.comresponded

Profile · 10

About.meabout.meresponded
Gravatargravatar.comresponded
Behancebehance.netresponded
Dribbbledribbble.comresponded
GitHubgithub.comresponded
GitLabgitlab.comresponded
Product Huntproducthunt.comblocks automated checks
Wellfoundwellfound.comresponded
Disqusdisqus.comresponded
Gumroadgumroad.comresponded

Document · 3

SlideShareslideshare.netresponded
Issuuissuu.comresponded
Scribdscribd.comresponded

Media · 5

SoundCloudsoundcloud.comresponded
Vimeovimeo.comresponded
Flickrflickr.comresponded
500px500px.comresponded
DeviantArtdeviantart.comresponded

Social · 3

Pinterestpinterest.comresponded
Myspacemyspace.comresponded
Plurkplurk.comresponded

Community · 4

Redditreddit.comresponded
Quoraquora.comblocks automated checks
Indie Hackersindiehackers.comresponded
Stack Exchangestackexchange.comresponded

Bookmarking · 6

Diigodiigo.comblocks automated checks
Pearltreespearltrees.comresponded
Scoop.itscoop.itresponded
Folkdfolkd.comblocks automated checks
Mixmix.comresponded
Pocketgetpocket.comresponded

A platform that blocks automated requests is not broken — plenty of large sites refuse traffic that does not look like a browser. It is listed separately because we could not confirm it ourselves, and saying so is more useful than quietly counting it as a pass.

Why a list like this goes stale

Almost every “top sites” list is copied from an older list, which was copied from an older one. Nothing in that chain re-checks the entries, so a platform that rebrands, moves domain or shuts down stays on every list indefinitely.

That is the same failure we see in link reports. A file listing 300 placements looks identical whether the pages exist or not, which is why we fetch every URL in a customer report before it is sent — and why we re-ran this list rather than reprinting one.

This page is re-checked when we update it, and the date at the top is the date it actually ran. If an entry here has moved since, it is our error to fix, not yours to discover.